Welcome to KIWIreviews - product reviews
•  click here to return to the homepage  •
Welcome visitor.Join us or log in

Product reviews on kiwireviews.nz : Sunday 22nd December 2024 - 15:57:12

QuickSearch for:    What is QuickSearch?
QuickJump to:    What is QuickJump?
logon name: p/w:  

I want to:

You Are Here...

Home > Categories > Movies > Documentaries > Genesis 2.0 review

« Blaze and the Monster Machines : Light Riders reviewBlaze and the Monster Machines : Light Riders Big in Japan reviewBig in Japan »

Score: 9.3/10  [1 review]
4 out of 5
ProdID: 7921 - Genesis 2.0
Topic: Climate Change

Genesis 2.0
Price:
TBC
Available:
See website for session details

Genesis 2.0 product reviews

On the remote New Siberian Islands in the Arctic Ocean, hunters search for tusks of extinct mammoths. When they discover a surprisingly well-preserved mammoth carcass, its resurrection becomes the first manifestation of the next great technological revolution: genetics, and it may turn the world upside down.

Part of the 2018 DocEdge Cinematic Festival - see http://docedge.nz/ for more details.



Tags:
china   christian frei   eduard artemyev   genesis 20   ivory   mammoth   max richter   peter indergand   russia   tusk
Other listings you may be interested in:
National TreasureNational Treasure
Rating: 8.9
Star Trek : 8 : First ContactStar Trek : 8 : First Contact
Rating: 9.5
My Best Friend's GirlMy Best Friend's Girl
Rating: 5.1
Percy Jackson and the Lightning ThiefPercy Jackson and the Lightning Thief
Rating: 8.4
Cirque du Soleil: Worlds Away (3D)Cirque du Soleil: Worlds Away (3D)
Rating: 9.4
Paranormal Activity 4Paranormal Activity 4
Rating: 1.8
Charlie's AngelsCharlie's Angels
Rating: 7.3
John WickJohn Wick
Rating: 10.0
The RewriteThe Rewrite
Rating: 10.0
Ocean's 8Ocean's 8
Rating: 8.0
Jurassic World: Fallen KingdomJurassic World: Fallen Kingdom
Rating: 6.8
Hellboy (2019)Hellboy (2019)
Rating: 5.3
AmmoniteAmmonite
Rating: 4.8

Product reviews...

Everyone is welcome to post a review. You will need to Join up or log in to post yours.

Click here to read the profile of alexmoulton

Review by: alexmoulton (Alex)
Dated: 23rd of April, 2018

Link to this review Report this review

 

This Review: 9.3/10
Accuracy:
Score 10 out of 10
Visual Presentation:
Score 9 out of 10
Extra Features:
Score 10 out of 10
Personal Choice:
Score 8 out of 10

There are very few people in the world that look at the consequences of ivory poachers with satisfaction. The idea that people are running around and killing elephants and rhinos for their tusks and horns is horrific and saddens me. There are, however, some forms of legal ivory, one of which being mammoth tusks. With the exception of one small population that died out in the East Siberian Wrangel Island in 1650, mammoths went extinct 10,000 years ago. With no risk of poaching as the animals are no longer alive, the harvesting of their tusks is largely legal. But how are these tusks harvested, who is doing it, and what is the point of harvesting tusks? Genesis 2.0 looks into these very questions.

The documentary follows two groups of people, that are linked by a set of brothers. Peter Grigoriev is a mammoth tusk hunter, who will spend entire seasons in Siberia, trying to locate a complete, pristine condition mammoth tusk (with some 69kg+ tusks selling for upwards of $100,000, and 20-30 tonnes of tusks being found every year, there is definitely a financial motivation for doing so). But on the other side, we have his brother, Semyon Grigoriev, scientist and mammoth researcher.

The documentary originally just follows the plight of these mammoth hunters, that are willing to take out huge bank loans to fund expeditions, and spend 8 months of the year away from their families, in the hopes of finding a tusk that will raise them out of their current social classes. The film takes a turn when Peter discovers a "fresh" specimen; a mammoth example with frozen flesh and blood, and his brother Semyon enters the picture.

A "fresh" specimen changes Semyon's potential end result from learning about the mammoth's remains, to having the ability to learn from a live specimen, if they are able to successfully bring the woolly mammoth back from extinction. Semyon then starts his journey of meeting with a variety of geneticists to consider how best to use what samples they have. From American geneticist and molecular engineer George Church, who wants to make a mammoth/elephant hybrid, to cloning pioneer Woo Suk Hwang, who as already successfully cloned 1000's of dogs for mourning pet owners.

This documentary looks at the differences in social classes, and the ethical implications of not only bringing a mammoth back from extinction but gene sequencing in general, having the ability in the future to be able to discern illnesses and susceptibility to disease from one's genetics. An interesting look at two sides of the same coin.

Random listing from 'Movies'...

Score: 6.5
Product reviews for listing 7133: Maze Runner: Scorch Trials -  Directed by Wes Ball

Product image for Maze Runner:  Scorch TrialsBased on the Book by James Dashner, the second segment of the Maze Runner books.

In this next chapter of the epic "Maze Runner" saga, Thomas (Dylan O'Brien) and his fellow Gladers face their greatest challenge yet: searching for clues about the mysterious and powerful organization known as WCKD.

Their journey takes them to the Scorch, a desolate landscape filled with unimaginable obstacles. Teaming up with resistance fighters, the Gladers take on WCKD's vastly superior forces and uncover its shocking plans for them all.

Go to the listing

General Disclaimer...

Protected by Copyscape Plagiarism Checker - Do not copy content from this page. Creative Commons Licence All trademarks, images and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective companies.
KIWIreviews is an independent entity, part of the Knock Out News Group. This is a free public forum presenting user opinions on selected products, and as such the views expressed do not necessarily reflect the opinion of kiwireviews.nz and are protected under New Zealand law by the "Honest Opinion" clause of the Defamation Act of 1992. KIWIreviews accepts no liability for statements made on this site, on the premise that they have been submitted as the true and honest opinions of the individual posters. In most cases, prices and dates stated are approximate and should be considered as only guidelines.

"The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an bacon-and-eggs breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' but the pig was 'committed'"
anonymous